ÉCU FILM FESTIVAL, 2025
Raoul Dattola
SOLITARIUM

Festival Screening
7 Parnassiens – Grande Salle
11, May 2025
Session 8 - 17:04
April, 25, 2025
A hermit who is a recluse from the world. The employee of a grocery store with broken dreams. Her neighbor with disturbing inclinations. An unemployed person looking for a job. A child left alone at home with his imaginary friend. All these lonely people with crossed destinies were the patients of Arthur Morhan, a psychoanalyst on the verge of a breakdown…
Hi Raoul, thank you for talking with The New Current. Are you looking forward having your your film Solitarium at ÉCU this May?
Let's just say that I'm torn between the always enriching feedback from the audience and my not always very healthy relationship with this film. It's true that it's always comforting when someone tells you how much your film has touched them, or when others make profound analyses of it... but my cynical side tells me that those who don't like it rarely speak up in public. And, even without that, reviewing Solitarium remains an ordeal for me. It's hard to remain objective and not let your neuroses speak for themselves when you see the same irremediable mistakes on screen over and over again, for which you alone are responsible. But I always try to remember that it's also the imperfections of a work that make it unique.
What does it mean to you to have Solitarium in the European Dramatic Feature Category?
I'm very honored. I really am. Especially since the films selected seem to be brimming with ideas and a sincere desire for expression, while at the same time having very distinct visual styles. In all honesty, I can't wait to see some of them. Not to mention that this is the last festival in which Solitarium will be presented, which is no small thing for me either.
Solitarium has had a great festival run, gaining multiple nominations including Best Director at Nice International Film Festival (2024), what has it meant to you to get such a great reaction to your film?
To tell the truth, for Nice, I was unfortunately unable to attend (a computer problem made me discover the many emails they had sent me too late). But, having been to the other festivals, I was sincerely touched that the film was able to win a prize among others I've seen and loved. Although it's always good to remember that appreciation in art remains subjective, it always helps to heal the wounds incurred during years of hard work.
How important are festivals like ÉCU in champion and supporting independent films and filmmakers?
Promoting independent cinema is already an end in itself and remains for me the only possible way for cinema to continue to live, not survive. Yes, cinema started out as a commercial tourist attraction, but its infinite potential for creativity soon led us to refer to the medium as the seventh art. Today, we've regressed. Almost all of us consume essentially “industrial cinema”. A cinema that often simply repeats formulas that work as long as they bring profit, without deep research, generated by producers and formatted former students, who are more motivated by the idea of making a film rather than feeling a real need for it, convinced that they have a monopoly on the culture of good taste, that they have already understood everything, and where any message delivered will be, at best, consensual and, at worst, mercantile.
Promoting independent cinema means advocating real artistic expression that isn't motivated by greed, where the discourse comes from the heart and where we're perpetually seeking to unravel the mysteries of cinematography rather than simply imitating what's already been done over and over again. I don't think that's the intention of all independent films, I'm just saying that it's the one type of cinema that's most likely to have that kind of integrity.
Can you tell me a little bit about how Solitarium came about, what was the inspiration behind your screenplay?
I had just finished “Parias”, a self-produced mini-series (6x52'). In view of the many positions I also held on this “5 and a half hour film”, it took me five years to finish it all. Five years I spent putting into images a story I'd written when I was 19, and from which I felt increasingly distant. Five years of spending most of my time alone in front of three screens, trapped in the same universe. And five years wanting to explore my own idea of cinema through this project. So, when I finally found myself free, my decision was made: the next project was going to be the opposite of the previous one. If “Parias” was my cinematic “thesis”: a linear noir series in three acts, full of archetypes and telling a story that was ambitious yet still classic, Solitarium would be the antithesis: more intimate, proposing a narrative system off the beaten track and taking full advantage of the creative freedom that self-production allows.To do this, I've opted for a mix between “ensemble film” and “sketch film”, giving myself no genre limits on the different stories told, while making them evolve in the same universe.
Starting in 2019, I began producing several closely connected short films, as well as a final chapter that would tie all the adventures together in a feature-length film reflecting on solitude: Solitarium.

What was it about the theme of loneliness and isolation that interested you as a screenwriter and how reflective are you as a writer?
The years of loneliness I spent in post-production had a lot to do with it, but it's also because loneliness affects us all in one way or another. Of course, the discourse developed throughout the film will be more complete than anything I can say here, but solitude is also a theme that is an ideal “Trojan horse” for conveying a whole host of sub-themes such as “the quest for identity”, “Western malaise”, “responsibility”, “greed”, “honesty” (...). Sub-themes which, in this film, are most often mocked in the hope of putting the viewer's own condition into perspective.
Because yes, even if I don't know the true measure of it, being reflexive in my films is all I aspire to now. Moralism and militancy are methodologies that may have appealed to me at one time, but they lock the viewer into the narrow vision of an author persuaded of holding a truth that he wishes to spread. Reflexivity tends to be more impartial and, today, I associate it with my desire to offer a personal reflection on the world, without directly issuing a definite judgment and while remaining as sincere and self-critical as possible.
How essential is the creative collaboration between you and your team once you start shooting a project?
I'm infinitely grateful for my team's support and mastery. But, strictly speaking, there is no creative collaboration on my projects at the moment. There are, of course, suggestions, particularly from actors or technicians, but to tell the truth, holding so many positions on my films has led me to build up, in spite of myself, a kind of autocracy. It may sound scary when you put it like that, but I'd rather be an honest artistic dictatorship than a collective of hypocritical artisans. What I mean by this is that many of us only remember the name of a director and give him or her all the credit without taking into account all the artists behind the scenes. And that's something I don't want to do. I'm aware that this can be perceived as narrow-mindedness, but while I admit that cinema can be a collective art, I believe that it might also be a more individual one. For my part, I haven't yet been able to work any differently when it comes to a work I consider to be my baby.
Do you allow yourself much flexibility with your screenplay once you start shooting?
For this film, without a shadow of a doubt. The particularity of this project was that I didn't plan everything in advance, and each story emerged gradually throughout the production. Above all, I followed my heart, without knowing in advance where the final chapter, which would bring all the stories together, would lead me. In other words, getting this film produced would have been mission impossible... I'd have had to walk into a producer's office and say: “I'm going to make a film. I don't know where I'm going. Who's with me?”
What was the hardest scene for you to write and direct?
This is more of a “special effects” part than a “directing” part, but I'd still say these are the sequences where the teddy bear appears. The actor, Eddy Del Pino, who had his head in a teddy bear, was dressed in green to make it easier to integrate in post-production. But all his scenes included ambient smoke, which compromised the integration. I had to cut out the teddy bear frame by frame, which took seven months and led me to burn-out. My brother was kind enough to do the last month of rotoscoping. As for the writing, the final scene was probably the part I worked on the most, since it synthesised all the speeches. But it paid off in the end, because when we shot the psychoanalyst's final monologue, it was the first time I could say that a take was perfect... but that was mainly due to Eddy Frogeais' masterful performance, who ended up being truly possessed by his role.
Looking back now is there anything you would have done differently on Solitarium?
With the documentation I've continued to accumulate and what I've learned in the field, one thing's for sure: I'll be doing things differently for my next feature film. But the mistakes I made in Solitarium are an integral part of its uniqueness. An “antithesis” had to be chaotic. Even if, for my own well-being, I should perhaps have taken less literally the old adage that says “from constraint comes creativity”, which has often led me to take an unhealthy pleasure in putting obstacles in my own way. In short, post-production on this film was a nightmare, but it was necessary to get me out of my comfort zone.
As well as write and direct Solitarium you also did the cinematography, music, and post-production. How did you manage all these creative roles on a feature like this, and would you do this again?
To tell you the truth, I don't really know when I'm going to stop doing that. It took me a little longer to start composing my own music, but overall, it's a working method I've had since the beginning... even if it makes more sense in this film about solitude. I was talking earlier about the conscious or unconscious way in which directors appropriate the work of artists in the shadows. That's because it's something that deeply affected me when I was younger. One story I often repeat is that, as a kid, I was a Star Wars fan. I even had a photo of George Lucas hanging in my bedroom. When I was making my comics and little films, I even told myself to “think like George Lucas”. And one day, in a making of, I saw him enter a room where fifty artists were proposing all kinds of different designs for a single character... I took it as an affront. I was convinced that everything I saw in his films came from his own imagination. It was my first idol fall. So, in order not to disappoint the child I was, and to do everything I could to avoid “appropriating someone else’s artistic talent,” , I told myself that I was going to do as many things as possible in my films. As well as being a personal challenge, it was essential at the time, because when you start making films on your own, you can only rely on yourself. And then, finally, it became a visceral need, as if practicing all the arts that make up cinema gave me a better understanding of cinematography as a whole. And since I see creation as a perpetual search, I wouldn't feel I was searching as much if I did fewer things. But it's true that the more time passes, the more testing it is, and despite the 5 and a half hours of film that Parias represented, the fact that I'm getting older and the experimental singularity of Solitarium made this two-hour film the most grueling post-production experience I've ever had.
Have you always had a passion for filmmaking and storytelling?
Always. From my earliest years, my difficulty in expressing myself led me to drawing, and then to comics. In my head, I could see my stories coming to life and sometimes even accompanied by music, but the modest background I grew up in made me think it was impossible to make films out of them... until the day a summer camp counsellor showed me an editing table... and the path of possibilities suddenly opened up for me. I quit comics, started a humorous web-series (Tripeman) at the age of fourteen, then began directing its feature-length adaptation (Tripeman - Legend), which I released in 2007 in the cinema in the town where I lived. After that, I quit school and never did anything else but cinema.
"I may often consider myself relativistic and anti-dogmatic, but despite myself, I have a religion that sticks with me, and that’s the seventh art."
How much has your approach to your film projects evolved since Tripeman: Legend?
If “Parias” was my “thesis” and “Solitarium” my “antithesis”, “Tripeman - Legend” was clearly my “essay”. At the age of fifteen, my only ambition was to see if I could make an hour-and-a-half-long film, with just a DV camera and a built-in microphone, accompanied by some friends to act before bringing it to the screen (at least, in one cinema). I suspected the result would be laughable, but that was the point-it could only work as a goofy comedy that never takes itself seriously. It was only after this experience that I began to search for something deeper, pushing further with each project. But the irony is that I never had as many sold-out screenings as I did with Tripeman Legend... even though it was, without a doubt, my most mediocre film.
What is it about film as a medium that interests you so much and who are the filmmakers that have inspired you?
As I roughly mentioned earlier, art has always been the best means of expression for me. Speech is too fallible, and it used to freak me out even more when I was a kid. But when you're preparing a piece of art, you have time to think about what you're saying, to make it less impulsive, to use symbolism or metaphors to make it more attractive, or to convey raw emotions as in music or drama.In addition to being my catharsis, cinema encompasses almost all the arts and is for me the best medium in which to fully develop one's creativity, master the most artistic languages and constantly reinvent oneself. I may often consider myself relativistic and anti-dogmatic, but despite myself, I have a religion that sticks with me, and that’s the seventh art.
As for filmmakers, there are so many. And what's pretty crazy is that when I realize I've had an unconscious inspiration, it's often from those I least expect. But if I had to talk about the filmmakers still active who continue to surprise me, Paul Thomas Anderson, Jaco Van Dormael and Darren Aronofsky are the ones who would come to me first.
What has been the most valuable lessons you have taken from making Solitarium and how will these help you with future feature projects?
There are far too many to mention. To keep it short, my next feature film, which will be my “synthesis”, will use a very different working method, attempting to strike a gentle balance between mastery and chaos.
Solitarium, on the other hand, began with chaos, only to be restructured in post-production... a post-production I didn't think I'd survive. And just to counterbalance that, the next film will also have a much denser pre-production. While I haven't even finished the script yet, I'm already preparing the music and a colour grading formula that emulates film stock, which I'll integrate directly into the camera equipped with highly characterful vintage lenses and combined with anamorphic adapters. But above all, there will be a significant amount of work done beforehand on the lighting and the actors’ performances. The goal is to make everything feel more organic and to avoid post-production as much as possible, which I find increasingly off-putting (especially with the recent surge of AI, which devalues the hours I’ve spent doing things that will soon take just one click for people who are a bit less grumpy and old-fashioned than I am on the subject).
What does your work say about you and the way you see the world?
I believe my films will answer that question better than any biased self-analyses I might make of them. But it's a vision that, in any case, is always in motion.
What has been the best advice you’ve been given by a fellow filmmaker and is there any advice you would offer a new filmmaker?
I haven't really had any advice from any filmmaker I've come across, but for my part, I'd say:
Don't be consensual or mercantile. Express what you have inside you-that's what is most likely to be unique... and, paradoxically, to resonate with others.
And finally, what is the message you would like your audiences to take from Solitarium?
The most benevolent message I've ever written in a film is in the closing monologue of Solitarium, where the psychoanalyst actually addresses the audience directly. I hope that, like the rest of the film, it will resonate with you.